RE: Brabbel Sabbel Thread - 7

Inshallah

so



so



oder so

hm

http://www.livestation.com/channels/123-nhk-world-english

Ausländer nach Deutschland zu holen, ist anscheinend doch nicht so einfach, wie viele denken. oO

Ich probier bloß mal was aus.

Und was?

Zitat

---

Individuals are doing it, banks are doing it — faced with the horrific news and pictures from Japan, everybody wants to do something, and the obvious thing to do is to donate money to some relief fund or other.

Please don’t.

We went through this after the Haiti earthquake, and all of the arguments which applied there apply to Japan as well. Earmarking funds is a really good way of hobbling relief organizations and ensuring that they have to leave large piles of money unspent in one place while facing urgent needs in other places. And as Matthew Bishop and Michael Green said last year, we are all better at responding to human suffering caused by dramatic, telegenic emergencies than to the much greater loss of life from ongoing hunger, disease and conflict. That often results in a mess of uncoordinated NGOs parachuting in to emergency areas with lots of good intentions, where a strategic official sector response would be much more effective. Meanwhile, the smaller and less visible emergencies where NGOs can do the most good are left unfunded.

In the specific case of Japan, there’s all the more reason not to donate money. Japan is a wealthy country which is responding to the disaster, among other things, by printing hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of new money. Money is not the bottleneck here: if money is needed, Japan can raise it. On top of that, it’s still extremely unclear how or where organizations like globalgiving intend on spending the money that they’re currently raising for Japan — so far we’re just told that the money “will help survivors and victims get necessary services,” which is basically code for “we have no idea what we’re going to do with the money, but we’ll probably think of something.”

Globalgiving, it’s worth pointing out, was created to support “projects in the developing world,” where lack of money is much more of a problem than it is in Japan. I’m not at all convinced that the globalgiving model can or should be applied directly to Japan, without much if any thought about whether it’s the best way to address the issues there.

That said, it’s entirely possible that organizations like the Red Cross or Save the Children will find themselves with important and useful roles to play in Japan. It’s also certain that they have important and useful roles to play elsewhere. So do give money to them — and give generously! And give money to other NGOs, too, like Doctors Without Borders (MSF), which don’t jump on natural disasters and use them as opportunistic marketing devices. Just make sure it’s unrestricted. The official MSF position is exactly right:

The ability of MSF teams to provide rapid and targeted medical care to those most in need in more than 60 countries around the world – whether in the media spotlight or not – depends on the generous general contributions of our donors worldwide. For this reason, MSF does not issue appeals for support for specific emergencies and this is why we do not include an area to specify a donation purpose on our on-line donation form. MSF would not have been able to act so swiftly in response to the emergency in Haiti, as an example, if not for the ongoing general support from our donors. So we always ask our supporters to consider making an unrestricted contribution.

I’ve just donated $400 in unrestricted funds to MSF. Some of it might go to Japan; all of it will go to areas where it’s sorely needed. I’d urge you to do the same, rather than try to target money at whichever disaster might be in the news today.

Update: Some bright spark has set up a “Socks for Japan” drive. I’m not making this up. I trust that none of my readers are silly enough to send socks to Japan, but this is a great indication of how wasteful a lot of well-intentioned giving can be.

---

Unabhängige Messwerte auf www.wisnewski.de
Gerhard Wisnewski

Während sich angesichts der Reaktorkatastrophe in Japan mancher die bange Frage stellt, was wir wohl hierzulande von der radioaktiven Strahlung abbekommen werden, machen die Behörden heimlich still und leise dicht.
Berichten zufolge dürfen Messstationen an der Ostsee ihre Strahlenwerte nicht mehr veröffentlichen. Unabhängig gemessene Strahlenwerte gibt es auf der Website von Gerhard Wisnewski, www.wisnewski.de.

Datum: 19.03.11 22:10
Wert: 0.146 Mikrosievert/h

mal schaun was die nächsten tage so bringen -

Zitat von magnusfe

---

Datum: 19.03.11 22:10
Wert: 0.146 Mikrosievert/h

---

Aber Magnus...! Das ist weit unter "normal".

Im Durchschnitt beträgt die natürliche Strahlenbelastung in Deutschland ca. 2-2,5 milliSievert pro Jahr.
Das setzt sich im Wesnetlichen zusammen aus kosmischer Strahlung, Radonbelastung (terrestrische Strahlung, die regional unterschiedlich ausfällt) und der sog. inneren Strahlung.
"Normal" ist demnach etwa 0.2-0.3 mikroSievert/h!

Hmm ... Lybien ...

die NWO macht was sie will und sie hat das Militär der westmächte und die medien hinter sich

kann man eh machen nix nur zugucken

die NWO hat immer Recht

ausser bei Harmageddon ... da wird die NWO 200 Millionen Tote Soldaten erleiden

Na sowas aber auch

200 Millionen Tote Soldaten bei einem einzigen Krieg

und der EU Herrscher wird lebendigen Leibes in die Hölle geworfen werden

beeindruckend

Lang lebe die NWO

By the end of 2012 the dollar will be DEAD !!!

DEAD DEAD DEAD

http://www.n-tv.de/libyen/TV-USA-bombard...cle2880616.html

dann muss das us militär zurückgezogen werden weltweit um die amok laufenden us einwohner zu besänftigen

dann ist vorbei mit den wargames

die amis gehen mir langsam auf die nerven

food stamp country ... yes we cannot ...